Head-to-head captain comparison for Gameweek 10.
| Haaland Man City | Tavernier Bournemouth |
|---|
| xPts | 7.2 | 6.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Fixture | Nott'm Forest (A) | Ipswich Town (A) |
| Fixture difficulty (FDR) | 2 | 2 |
| Form | 7.2 | 6.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Minutes (season) | 799 | 750 |
| Bonus | 14 | 12 |
| xG (season) | 6.56 | 3.71 |
|---|---|---|
| xA (season) | 0.85 | 1.36 |
| xGI (season) | 7.41 | 5.07 |
| Goals | 9 | 5 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| ICT index | 86.1 | 73.0 |
| Price | £15.8m | £6.6m |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership | 79.0% | 27.6% |
| Team | Man City | Bournemouth |
| Position | FWD | MID |
| XI Predictor grade | A+ | A+ |
Haaland remains the safest captaincy choice for the gameweek. While Tavernier offers excellent value and a lower price point, Haaland continues to lead in expected points. Even with his high cost, his goal-scoring consistency is difficult to ignore. Unless you need to save budget for elsewhere, keep the armband on Haaland. He is the most reliable option to deliver a significant haul this weekend.