Best midfielders for Gameweek 10

Top midfielders for Gameweek 10 ranked by expected points.

The short version
  • • Tavernier (Bournemouth) tops the list at 6.0 xPts.
  • • Groß and Mbeumo round out the top 3.
Top-10 avg xPts
4.9
Top-10 avg ownership
22.3%
Cheapest
Iwobi (£5.4m)
Most expensive
Palmer (£9.8m)
Our top pick
Tavernier
6.0
xPts GW10
Bournemouth · MID · £6.6m · 27.6% owned
Fixture:
Ipswich Town (A)

Full ranking

#PlayerPricexPts GW10
1Tavernier
Bournemouth · MID
Also in: Captains · Top picks · Free hit
£6.6m6.0
2Groß
Brighton · MID
Also in: Captains · Top picks · Free hit
£6.2m5.2
3Mbeumo
Man Utd · MID
Also in: Top picks · Free hit
£7.9m5.2
4Ødegaard
Arsenal · MID
Also in: Top picks · Free hit
£6.7m4.9
5Rogers
Chelsea · MID
Also in: Top picks
£8.1m4.7
6Iwobi
Fulham · MID
£5.4m4.7
7Gibbs-White
Nott'm Forest · MID
£7.9m4.6
8Rice
Arsenal · MID
£7.4m4.5
9Palmer
Chelsea · MID
£9.8m4.4
10Dewsbury-Hall
Everton · MID
Also in: Differentials
£6.6m4.4

Expected points (GW10)

PlayerxPts
Tavernier6.0
Groß5.2
Mbeumo5.2
Ødegaard4.9
Rogers4.7
Iwobi4.7
Gibbs-White4.6
Rice4.5

Price vs expected points

PlayerPrice (£m)xPts
Tavernier6.66
Groß6.25.2
Mbeumo7.95.2
Ødegaard6.74.9
Rogers8.14.7
Iwobi5.44.7
Gibbs-White7.94.6
Rice7.44.5
Palmer9.84.4
Dewsbury-Hall6.64.4

What stands out

Tavernier leads the way this gameweek as a high-value differential following his recent form. Gross remains a reliable engine for Brighton, consistently finding space in the final third. Mbeumo offers significant upside against a fragile Manchester United defensive unit, making him an essential pick for those targeting goals. While Ødegaard is a proven creator, his lower projected points reflect Arsenal’s current tactical adjustments. Prioritize Tavernier for potential value, but keep Mbeumo in your starting lineup to capitalize on the defensive vulnerability of his opponent.

Per-player notes
Tavernier — 6.0 xPts, form 6.0, 6.1 ppg, 27.6% owned. xG 3.71 · xA 1.36 · ICT 73.
Groß — 5.2 xPts, form 3.2, 6.7 ppg, 46.9% owned. xG 2.16 · xA 1.57 · ICT 74.
Mbeumo — 5.2 xPts, form 4.8, 4.9 ppg, 20.4% owned. xG 4.24 · xA 1.27 · ICT 73.
Ødegaard — 4.9 xPts, form 2.5, 4.3 ppg, 16.6% owned. xG 2.16 · xA 2.14 · ICT 61.
Rogers — 4.7 xPts, form 5.2, 5.6 ppg, 52.4% owned. xG 2.78 · xA 1.44 · ICT 71.
Iwobi — 4.7 xPts, form 6.0, 4.2 ppg, 1.4% owned. xG 1.35 · xA 2.76 · ICT 63.
Gibbs-White — 4.6 xPts, form 1.5, 4.2 ppg, 10.7% owned. xG 2.54 · xA 2.28 · ICT 60.
Rice — 4.5 xPts, form 6.8, 5.2 ppg, 12.4% owned. xG 0.44 · xA 2.01 · ICT 55.
Glossary
xPts
Expected points: our model's forecast for the player's next gameweek score.
FDR
Fixture difficulty rating, 1 (easiest) to 5 (hardest).
xG / xA / xGI
Expected goals, expected assists, and the sum (expected goal involvements).
ICT
The Influence-Creativity-Threat composite published with official data.
Ownership
Percent of managers who currently own the player.
Form
Recent points-per-match average over the last several matches.
xPts/£m
Expected points produced per £1m of price — our value score.
Snapshot taken 3 Nov 2026
Picks are deterministic from a snapshot of player news, prices, fixtures, and form at publish time. The model blends Expected Points (xPts) with fixture difficulty, expected minutes, and bonus likelihood. Read the full methodology.