The eleven players who produced the most FPL points. Budget ignored. Reality respected.
The Team of the Season is not a buildable squad. There's no £100m budget, no three-per-club limit, no positional cap beyond a notional 3-4-3. What follows is the season's actual heat map, laid out by position. Who produced, where, and by how much.
Bruno Fernandes finished top with 235 points, but the structural detail underneath is what matters more for thinking about 2026/27. Three midfielders cleared 200 this season. Two defenders broke into the overall top fifteen. The forwards behind Haaland were closer together than usual, which makes the second forward slot a more open question than the table suggests. Midfield carried the year, and that's the pattern most worth carrying into squad-building decisions.
Below the pitch you'll find a player-by-player breakdown of the eleven, followed by full position leaderboards down to the top fifteen. The leaderboards are where the more useful 2026/27 thinking actually lives. The top three names in each bracket will be priced for top three production. The names ranked five through fifteen are where the value gets made or lost.
Each player's headline production, with a short note on what the data thinks made their season go. xG over-performance is flagged where it matters, because finishing well above expected goals is the part of a season that historically does not repeat cleanly.











The full position leaderboards. The top three names in each bracket usually price themselves. The players ranked five through fifteen are where the more useful 2026/27 takes actually live, because that's the band where the gap between price and production is widest.
| # | Player | Club | Pts | CS | CBIT | Cost | Rating | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Raya | Arsenal | 162 | 19 | 0 | £6.2m | 87 | A |
| 2 | Kelleher | Brentford | 143 | 10 | 0 | £4.8m | 70 | B+ |
| 3 | Roefs | Sunderland | 136 | 10 | 0 | £4.8m | 78 | A |
| 4 | Donnarumma | Man City | 135 | 15 | 0 | £5.6m | 73 | B+ |
| 5 | Pickford | Everton | 135 | 11 | 0 | £5.6m | 66 | B+ |
| 6 | Henderson | Crystal Palace | 131 | 11 | 0 | £5.1m | 60 | B |
| 7 | Verbruggen | Brighton | 130 | 10 | 0 | £4.6m | 75 | A |
| 8 | Petrović | Bournemouth | 124 | 11 | 0 | £4.6m | 49 | C+ |
| 9 | Leno | Fulham | 122 | 9 | 0 | £5.0m | 57 | B |
| 10 | Martinez | Aston Villa | 120 | 7 | 0 | £5.0m | 62 | B |
| 11 | Sánchez | Chelsea | 113 | 9 | 0 | £4.8m | 61 | B |
| 12 | Lammens | Man Utd | 109 | 8 | 0 | £5.1m | 88 | A+ |
| 13 | Sels | Nott'm Forest | 105 | 7 | 0 | £4.6m | 63 | B |
| 14 | Dúbravka | Burnley | 96 | 4 | 0 | £4.0m | 84 | A |
| 15 | Pope | Newcastle | 96 | 7 | 0 | £5.0m | 51 | C+ |
| # | Player | Club | Pts | G | A | CS | CBIT | Cost | Rating | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gabriel | Arsenal | 209 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 277 | £7.3m | 85 | A+ |
| 2 | Guéhi | Man City | 179 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 278 | £5.1m | 87 | A+ |
| 3 | Senesi | Bournemouth | 175 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 419 | £5.2m | 77 | A |
| 4 | Virgil | Liverpool | 175 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 352 | £6.1m | 83 | A |
| 5 | Tarkowski | Everton | 170 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 376 | £5.8m | 70 | B+ |
| 6 | Truffert | Bournemouth | 165 | 1 | 6 | 11 | 301 | £4.8m | 55 | C+ |
| 7 | O'Reilly | Man City | 160 | 5 | 4 | 14 | 172 | £5.3m | 84 | A+ |
| 8 | Matheus N. | Man City | 154 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 195 | £5.3m | 68 | B+ |
| 9 | Lacroix | Crystal Palace | 154 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 370 | £5.2m | 71 | B+ |
| 10 | Mukiele | Sunderland | 151 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 273 | £4.6m | 68 | B+ |
| 11 | J.Timber | Arsenal | 149 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 148 | £6.0m | 29 | D+ |
| 12 | Van Hecke | Brighton | 148 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 317 | £4.7m | 74 | A |
| 13 | Saliba | Arsenal | 137 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 193 | £6.3m | 29 | D+ |
| 14 | Muñoz | Crystal Palace | 136 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 196 | £5.9m | 65 | B |
| 15 | Chalobah | Chelsea | 136 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 265 | £5.4m | 29 | D+ |
| # | Player | Club | Pts | G | A | CBIT | Cost | Rating | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | B.Fernandes | Man Utd | 235 | 9 | 24 | 287 | £10.4m | 99 | A+ |
| 2 | Semenyo | Man City | 202 | 17 | 6 | 236 | £8.0m | 72 | A+ |
| 3 | Gibbs-White | Nott'm Forest | 188 | 15 | 4 | 178 | £7.6m | 60 | A |
| 4 | Rice | Arsenal | 184 | 4 | 9 | 376 | £7.2m | 65 | A+ |
| 5 | Anderson | Nott'm Forest | 180 | 4 | 5 | 515 | £5.7m | 57 | A |
| 6 | Rogers | Aston Villa | 169 | 10 | 8 | 230 | £7.3m | 68 | A+ |
| 7 | Wilson | Fulham | 168 | 10 | 9 | 177 | £5.8m | 51 | A |
| 8 | Szoboszlai | Liverpool | 160 | 6 | 7 | 338 | £7.1m | 82 | A+ |
| 9 | Garner | Everton | 159 | 2 | 7 | 458 | £5.2m | 20 | D |
| 10 | Enzo | Chelsea | 157 | 10 | 5 | 244 | £6.5m | 51 | B+ |
| 11 | Saka | Arsenal | 157 | 7 | 10 | 184 | £10.0m | 58 | A |
| 12 | Bruno G. | Newcastle | 154 | 9 | 7 | 251 | £6.9m | 53 | A |
| 13 | Dewsbury-Hall | Everton | 151 | 8 | 7 | 230 | £5.3m | 46 | B+ |
| 14 | Mbeumo | Man Utd | 148 | 11 | 3 | 139 | £8.3m | 72 | A+ |
| 15 | E.Le Fée | Sunderland | 147 | 5 | 6 | 319 | £4.8m | 61 | A |
| # | Player | Club | Pts | G | A | CBIT | Cost | Rating | Grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haaland | Man City | 239 | 27 | 8 | 104 | £14.7m | 94 | A+ |
| 2 | Thiago | Brentford | 181 | 22 | 1 | 214 | £7.2m | 58 | A |
| 3 | João Pedro | Chelsea | 177 | 15 | 9 | 138 | £7.4m | 72 | A+ |
| 4 | Watkins | Aston Villa | 167 | 16 | 4 | 94 | £8.7m | 52 | B+ |
| 5 | Calvert-Lewin | Leeds | 142 | 14 | 2 | 105 | £5.8m | 56 | A |
| 6 | Gyökeres | Arsenal | 128 | 14 | 1 | 85 | £9.1m | 51 | B+ |
| 7 | Welbeck | Brighton | 126 | 13 | 1 | 112 | £6.3m | 43 | B |
| 8 | Ekitiké | Liverpool | 125 | 11 | 4 | 85 | £9.0m | 20 | D |
| 9 | Richarlison | Spurs | 119 | 11 | 4 | 147 | £6.5m | 45 | B |
| 10 | Evanilson | Bournemouth | 115 | 6 | 7 | 135 | £6.6m | 37 | C+ |
| 11 | Mateta | Crystal Palace | 114 | 12 | 0 | 125 | £7.6m | 44 | B |
| 12 | Igor Jesus | Nott'm Forest | 114 | 6 | 6 | 123 | £5.9m | 47 | B+ |
| 13 | Kroupi.Jr | Bournemouth | 113 | 13 | 0 | 112 | £4.7m | 14 | D |
| 14 | Šeško | Man Utd | 111 | 11 | 2 | 64 | £7.2m | 43 | B |
| 15 | Woltemade | Newcastle | 108 | 8 | 4 | 105 | £6.7m | 38 | C+ |
Two takeaways from the eleven worth carrying into next season. First, midfield was the deepest bracket of the year by a real margin. There were more legitimately must-own candidates at midfielder than at any other position, and that kind of depth tends to pull pre-season money out of forwards and into the £6.5 to £9.5m midfield band. Expect the same shape when 2026/27 prices land.
Second, the defenders who made the eleven all did it on a combination of clean sheets and CBIT, not one or the other. Pure clean-sheet bets are no longer the best defender archetype. The highest-scoring defenders combined both streams, and that changes how a serious 2026/27 back four should be built. You're looking for defenders who can hold a clean sheet and contribute defensively in matches where they don't, which is a different filter than the one most managers used twelve months ago.
Open the Player Search tool when 2026/27 launches and filter by position. The rating fields in the leaderboards above translate directly into next-gameweek expected points the moment the new season starts.